The first bar chart provides data about the average prices of houses in Britain in general and London in specific between 1995 and 2013. The second one shows the house expenses in other 6 regions of England reported in 2013.
Overall, throughout 8 years, the average accommodation prices in London were always higher than that of the whole Britain. Additionally, the overall trend was upward.
According to the first chart, in 1995, the house prices in England and its capital city were about 130 thousand and 200 thousand respectively. In the following 8 years, the average expenditure in England slightly increased to 200 thousand. The figure for London experienced a sharp growth, from 200000 to about 420000.
In 2013, in others areas of the UK namely Midlands, North and South East, North and South West, the average house expenses were lower than in London. Specifically, the lowest level was 100000 in North East, which were four times lower than that of London. The house prices in South East was higher than all mentioned regions, which was 320000 pounds but still 80000 pounds lower compared to London’s figure.
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person in an Australian university 67
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03743315508 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4549357163 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8598582395 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346937195041 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133086569794 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960868842796 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213007486547 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109010844846 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.