The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion in clothes and other consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree?
Human beings have the same trait is to mimic each other in their development since they were born. This tendency is specifically reflected in terms of the popularity of fashion and goods, which I agree with this statement. In this essay, I will analyze the customer demands and the learning process to illustrate my opinion.
From my point of view, the customer demands are increasing proven the number of copied goods in the market. To illustrate, people are more likely to experience the exclusive design which has excessive prices that not everyone can afford. To satisfy people’s desire, for instance, many Chinese factories have emerged to manufacture imitated products with affordable prices than competitor brands, especially luxury ones, bringing a huge revenue for its country annual year. Therefore, to adequately supply large sources of demand, procedures have to copy from others.
Furthermore, the learning process in the fashion and goods manufacturing industry plays a vital role to deal with customer demands. To clarify, products such as clothes and shoes are so easy to imitate so procedures tend to copy from available designs rather than investing in research or reproduction to create newness. For example, in Vietnam, the majority of fashion local brands intend to update current trends on reputable brands’ websites cope with their innovative ideas to create a new style, which is not only cost and time-saving but also a source of inspiration to help small companies leverage in their field. Thus, the more high customer consumption is, the more the learning process grows up.
In my conclusion, the market demands and the learning process influence the tendency of imitation of human beings in the production of goods. Personally, I think that governments should implement intellectual property laws to protect companies whose innovative assets from imitators.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79602820024 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619528619529 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6069888758 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135432502991 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473049755917 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467441951013 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817035053842 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036859551744 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.