The following is a diagram of mobile phone recycling process Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph provided reveals some information on the process it takes for a mobile phone in order to become recycled. It is evident that the mentioned process is not strightforward and it takes a lot for a mobile phone to turn into raw materials or Energy.
After the cellphones are being collected, they are being stored and the useable components are being separated for other use. Form the remainaning the batteries would be dismantled, then separated, and finaly the materials will be used. The remaining parts of phones would take the exact same procedure.
All the extracted materials are them categorized into matal parts and wiring board, plastics and other material. Metal parts will go through a refining process, except copper which only needs to be melted. Plastic parts will be either Peprocessed and eventually turn into lower grade plastics, or incinerated in order to turn into Energy resourceses.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14765100671 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75423027798 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4347498386 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832350713255 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446755085858 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577363344524 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680736743199 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728602807153 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14765100671 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75423027798 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4347498386 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832350713255 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446755085858 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577363344524 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680736743199 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728602807153 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.