Employers should focus on personal qualities instead of qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree?
Many people insist that companies should pay greater attention to the personal characteristics of candidates than their professional competence. I can only partially agree with this view, because both job qualifications and personality traits are equally important for a person to be successful in a job. In this essay, I will substantiate my view.
On the one hand, there is increased competition among the companies these days. In order to deliver the best results to their customers, organizations are after the most talented individuals. As such, professional expertise is undoubtedly vital for the people hired. The lack of sufficient job knowledge creates inequality between employees, and it will be an overhead for the corporate as well as the deserving candidates. If less skilled individuals are hired, many bright minds miss the opportunity. Likewise, companies incur huge losses when they waste money on unskilled staff.
On the other hand, there are several other aspects which are as crucial as the qualifications. Firstly, no one wishes to work with an unfriendly, selfish and arrogant person, who never applauds others’ success. By contrast, recruiting sociable, transparent and humorous team-players build cohesion in workplace. Secondly, they should be dynamic, adaptable and willing to learn new things. Even if job-aspirants are less skilled as per the job requirements but if they are enthusiastic with a strong desire to learn, they will surely be an asset to the company. Global behemoths such as Amazon and Google have an interview known as “leadership principle round” that assesses the candidates’ ability to work under pressure and their adaptability to the organizational work culture. Likewise, the human resource team collects information such as family background and hobbies of the interviewees as they give a glimpse of the character of their prospective employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | Chinkiarora | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | Chinkiarora | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | prathamp114 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010 67
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active as they were in the past what are the main causes of this situation Suggest some possible solution 73
- The diagrams below illustrate changes affected in the district park between 2004 and 2014
- individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels health and fitness is decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, thus, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52901023891 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21645149627 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645051194539 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1656889679 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119796793977 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033592726785 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511877918021 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924377394414 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596111223945 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.