The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the development of West Park Secondary School over the period of 60 years, starting from 1950.
Overall, the main road remained unchanged throughout the period. Interestingly, houses and farmland were completely disappeared while other features just witnessed the extension or reduction in size.
From 1950 to 1980, three houses located in the northwest were removed to make room for a new car park. The building was expanded into two parts, one is a science block nearing the car park and the other was seen as the main building. The place for farmland was demolished to construct a sports field. Over this period, the playground remained unchanged at the corner of the southeast.
In the next 30 years, from 1980, the enlargement of car park occupied the half of total school’s area. The playground and sports field were reduced in size to be located in the initial place of the playground. Meanwhile, the science block and main building stayed at the same location.
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With the increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 67
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 78
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In many western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children Discuss the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70798567381 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0199916736 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177626381626 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671148703962 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468280779578 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112743575087 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053714619481 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.