The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The change in the UK car ownership in four different categories from 1971 to 2007 is displayed in the line graph, shown in percentage.
Overall, the rate of Britain population having one car was the highest. However, that of British owning two or more cars experienced an upward trend, and others showed some changes.
Initially, the vast majority did not have cars, and there accounted for over slightly two-fifths having only one. Furthermore, the proportion of owners hiring two these vehicles was about a fourth of the latter, while that of three or more these such transports stood at the lowest, a fifth of maximum data recorded in 1971.
Eventually, the figure for no car ownership witnessed a dramatic decline to below a third, sharing almost the same percentage with that for people owning two cars increasing significantly. When it came to the British obtaining merely one private car, this rate remained stable, being the largest. Lastly, although a growth was revealed by the rest figure, it was still below one in ten.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive or a negative one 84
- News media is more influential nowadays Some people think it is a negative development To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive or a negative one 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01734104046 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63867609113 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687861271676 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9386734895 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239572054177 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093243520558 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907327618536 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147011538897 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982272742048 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.