In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the cases? What can be done this problem?
Meeting population nutrition needs is a controversial issue that seems pretty impossible within the constituent era now we are living in. Even though improvements in using new methods in agricultural scope have already happened, today's individuals would demand higher amount of food to overcome hunger. This essay will discuss the reasons why it is not feasible to provide people accurate food resources and what are the solutions by which can get this issue overcome.
To begin with, less amount of food would deeply root in two main factors including getting used to old methods and shortage of existing appropriate fields. First, what humans' ancestor used to do was acquiring some simple tools by which they could make the field soil ready and taking care of, until products get harvested. Accordingly, many farmers are still taking steps within that path ignoring new machines which could make their products duplicated by. Second, there are less proper farm fields available in case of earth erosion which was prompted by human implements and deforestation that will affect general human life in all scopes. For instance, farmers living in rural parts have just learnt farming techniques from their olders. Nevertheless there are lots of ways they could gain some new inquiries from, they would refused seeking new techniques. Additionally, humans activity occurring around would be the fact I witness every day influencing nature and making fields inappropriate to farm.
Alternatively, some solutions would get this process modified resulting more food resources.First, modern technology would be a key to success, as it is just a choice which will enhance productivity if people will be eager to use such alternatives. As an example, new irrigation tools just result in less water waste and better ideal implications. Second investing in further research could be a milestone finding new ways for conquering lack of existence of farm fields leading to making the unproper one useful growing some vegetables and plants in. Namely, adding specific contamination will provide a farm land which could be planted some beans.
To sum up, it seems infeasible meeting all individuals food commodities due to having old agricultural methods followed and farmlands unavailability. However, this concept could get altered as farmers come to using new farming methods and searching for solutions making their useless fields appropriate. In my prospective food resources will get increased if constituents take all the available choices into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-27 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-27 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-27 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets for last year and six years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 78
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the years 1996 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- many people have lost their interest to governmental job what is the main reason of this practice 73
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue some people think this money should not be invested this much To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue some people think this money should not be invested this much To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to farm'.
Suggestion: to farm
... living in rural parts have just learnt farming techniques from their olders. Neverthel...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...t farming techniques from their olders. Nevertheless there are lots of ways they could gain ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'refuse'
Suggestion: refuse
...ain some new inquiries from, they would refused seeking new techniques. Additionally, h...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king fields inappropriate to farm. Alternatively, some solutions would get ...
^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
... modified resulting more food resources.First, modern technology would be a key to su...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...sum up, it seems infeasible meeting all individuals food commodities due to having old agri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, for instance, in fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44472361809 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88640543408 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2906386781 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.470588235 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11442403513 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370489247349 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535940021357 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778328923028 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395315442556 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.