Given are two categories providing the amount of money paid on watching films in the period of 6 years from 2005 to 2011 as well as the proportion of market shares represemted in three forms in 2005 and 2011.
It is apparent that the price of watching film in all three different forms exeperiend an upward trend in the recorded period and the cost of cinema ticket was the highest through the recorded period. It is also noticeable that renting a DVD accounted the largest share of the market in both 2005 and 2011.
Starting from approximately 9 pounds in 2005, the cost of cinema ticket reaced 12 pounds in 2007 and experienced a slightly increasing period.From 2009, the price of cinema ticket witnessed a growth with higher rate until reaching its peak a 14 pounds in 2011. Concering the cost of legal download, first recorded at 8 pounds in 2005, it saw a dramatic decrease to 6 pounds in 2007. The subsequence decade, however, witnessed a gradual growth until peaking at over 8 pounds in 2011. Starting at the lowest position at 6 pounds in 2005, the cost of DVD growth gradually to about 7 pounds in 2007. This was followed by a stable period before increasing marginally to 8 pounds in 2011.
When it came to the market share of three forms of watching films, people spent most of their money on renting a DVD as it accounted more than half of the total share in both 2005 and 2011. Experiencing an increase from 6% in 2005 to 26% in 2011, the proportion of waching film online( legal download) came at the second place in 2011 while that of going to the cinema came at the third place after witnessing a drop by 12%.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 100
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms 67
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 82
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... market in both 2005 and 2011. Starting from approximately 9 pounds in 2005, the...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...xperienced a slightly increasing period.From 2009, the price of cinema ticket witnes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50126885258 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466216216216 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1332686622 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124359289918 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612655402051 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601986846955 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110246209436 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534075481345 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.