The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table delineating the proportion of population categorised based on three certain criteria, namely age, average income per person (units are measured in US dollars) and population below poverty line in three distinct states of America: California, Utah and Florida.
Perceptibly, Utah has by far the highest and the lowest percentages of the youngest and the oldest population respectively while the reverse is true for Floria. Meanwhile, there is a trend recorded that the higher standard earnings are in proportion to the rate of poverty-stricken citizens in these states.
When it comes to the proportion of the under-18s population, Utah enjoys widespread popularity among other places with 28% while those in California and Florida are 17% and 16% in turn. By contrast, the rate of the over-60s experiences an opposite order with Florida, California and Utah occupying 23%, 13% ,and 8% in sequence.
On the subject of the mean income and impoverished population, notwithstanding a dominant average income with 23,000 US dollars per person among three states mentioned, California also reports by far the most common form of the rate of indigence community with 16%. Second in terms of individual salaries on average and the percentage of people living under poverty line is Florida with 22,000 and 12%, followed by Utah with the least parts of 17,000 and 9% summarised.
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 84
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., California and Utah occupying 23%, 13% ,and 8% in sequence. On the subject of t...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mean income and impoverished population, notwithstanding a dominant average incom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25675675676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95101431927 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.112520931 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.714285714 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186456273237 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081641982324 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107423637204 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122586383047 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123894417 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.