The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The change in how many people visit Ashdown Museum throughout a year before and a year after refurbishment, and the percentage of satisfaction based on surveys along these periods are displayed in table and pie chart.
Overall, the number of visitors coming to the museum experiences an upward trend. However, the proportion of them satisfied witnessed an incline after the refurbishment conducted.
Initially, 74,000 attendees visited this museum, and the two fifths of them did not satisfy, being higher than one in ten feeling very dissatisfied. However, almost a third and one in five gave satisfied and very satisfied feedback, running. Furthermore, only a twentieth did not response the survey, being the lowest.
Eventually, the number of people attending this public attraction increases significantly to 92,000, and the refurbishment positively impacts a growth of satisfaction in the visit at a two-fifth, followed by that of very satisfied at a third. Additionally, it reduces dramatically the number of visitors experiencing unhappy tour by a quarter, then the proportion of no response and extremely dissatisfied is similar at 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | ghost000162 | view |
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtremely dissatisfied is similar at 5%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49152542373 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2309765827 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.936314091 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256223034214 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972794767355 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761353939902 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151317821737 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815461815673 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.