The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day.
Giving the pictures are comparing to renovation of the area from 1965 to up till now.
Overall, it can be noticed that there has been a considerable change in the area, in which the addition of architecture can be accessed smoothly for dwellers.
As can be obvious, the ferry had been replaced by a road bridge along with a foot bridge underneath itself that was directly approaching the city. In the present day, making a large car park on the left bank of the river, which is parallel with the foot bridge. Subsequently, the forest has been demolished, which is recreated by other car parks at a given time.
Looking at the north of the area, apartments had been constructed downstream, whereas, Assford had just four houses in 1965, then added one house in the modern-day. Furthermore, the scattered houses had been erected on the right rivers and there was also a new car park in this place.
- Multicultural societies where people of different ethnic groups live together can bring more benefits than drawbacks to a society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problem does this cause and what are the solutions 78
- The charts below show the total number of cruise passengers and their percentage according to age in 1975 and 2003 in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Nowadays people get information through the news but are uncertain about the truth of this news Should we believe the journalists what qualities should a good journalist or correspondent have 84
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, then, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74050632911 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67886055314 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8149864172 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103686632527 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495974583402 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485512510593 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667066032104 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298541698276 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, then, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74050632911 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67886055314 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8149864172 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103686632527 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495974583402 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485512510593 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667066032104 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298541698276 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.