The given bar chart illustrates the spending of France and the UK on consumer commodities in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that cars were the most preferred category by citizens in both examined countries. Furthermore, French people allocated more budget to computers and perfume in 2010, whereas the opposite was true for consumers in the UK in terms of cars, books, and cameras.
Regarding the former kind of goods, the year 2010 witnessed modest gaps between expenditures of two nations. Citizens in France spent nearly 380.000 pounds on purchasing computers, which is relatively higher than that of England people. The gap was more significant in the perfume group, which the budget for this kind of goods in France and the UK was 200.000 and 140.000 pounds, respectively.
For the remaining categories, the domination of the UK in terms of expenditure was remarkably obvious. The spending on cars in the UK, which was also the most popular goods, accounted for 450.000 pounds, higher 50.000 units compared to French's expense. The money was allocated for books in both countries was 400.000 and 300.000 pounds, respectively. Similarly, the UK citizens took aside 350.000 pounds for buying cameras, which was around twofold than that of the other subject.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics 10
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The number of people being sent to prison is increasing year on year While some people believe prisons are the best way to tackle crime others suggest that community service is successful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16097560976 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70631051383 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9077208569 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119360333048 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567840548228 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657640374328 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953356854253 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590463242647 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.