The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The given table indicates the percentage of various types of households in poor conditions inhabiting Australia in a specific year. The information that belongs to 6 different categories of families is present with an approximate number of people.
The majority of aged population was considerably one of the least poor household types. While the proportion of the unmarried ones was detected to be 6%, the rate of couples who were old was likely to be lower than the lone elderly (4%). Approximately a quarter of sole parents suffered from poverty in 1999 and it was observed to be 232,000 individuals in total. Even though only 12% of couples with children lived below average standards, the rate almost equals a million people which can be considered as the biggest number. The portion of single inhabitants with no child facing poverty was likely to be greater (19%) rather than the level of couples without any toddlers (7%). Additionally, the number of single individuals without children was detected to be roughly 360,000, whereas the ratio of partners was lower, around 210,000.
In conclusion, numerous categories of households who were poor individuals in 1999 in Australia were assumed to be roughly 2 million people which can be directed as 10% of the population more or less.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- The graphs above show the types of gifts that men and women in the USA buy for each other on Valentine s Day 78
- Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relations 89
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h an approximate number of people. The majority of aged population was conside...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10377358491 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86284617408 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2512115868 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157707558478 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634480147547 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487629974131 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117922580581 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496677980378 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.