Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional food and traditional methods of food preparation
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In modern society, people are seemed to be so busy to cook, this is the reason why convenience food has become a trend in many big cities. Some people even predict that convenience meal will be more popular and eventually replace traditional food or traditional cooking method in the future. As far as I am concerned, convenience meal will be a common option of people’s meal, but it cannot replace traditional food.
Convenience food is a good choice for people who do not have time to cook but want to eat fast foods, which are usually considered as contain high calories and low nutrition. Convenience food let people make a meal in some minutes. It still has enough nutrition and vitamins, because the ingredients are fresh and the cooking method is quite simple.
Despite of those advantages, it is impossible for convenience food to replace traditional food. The first reason is that people are not always busy, when they have time, most people want to enjoy a good meal with many different delicious dishes, which cannot be served by convenience food. In addition, many people still enjoy cooking, they will keep the flame of traditional food. The second reason is, convenience food actually is not an economical choice. Because the food needs to be prepared well before cooking, its cost are much more expensive than original food. Thus, convenience food will only become popular in big cities, where people are busy and make a good living. In countryside or un-developed countries, I believe that people still would like to make food on their own from scratch so they could save a lot of money.
In conclusion, convenience meals have become a thing in modern life but it cannot replace traditional food or traditional cooking method. Both will parallel exist in the future to meet the needs of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-09 | thao hoang | 67 | view |
- Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examinations 73
- we should return to more nature methods of food production such as organic farming even if this means we produce food less efficiently 61
- You have seen an advertisement in a newspaper for a job in the city post office during your holidays You decide to apply for the job Write a letter to the director of the post office In your letter introduce yourself explain what experience and special sk 73
- the percentage of young people who choose to eat a vegetarian diet in UK from 1960 to 2020
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t people want to enjoy a good meal with many different delicious dishes, which cannot be serve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, so, still, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91558441558 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66123670616 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50974025974 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9590422546 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403499526048 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169961941388 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100239090453 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275138458287 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739742733506 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.