Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays humans are dependent on a variety of technologies to complete their daily tasks, to some less-depended and some highly-depended. Several of the most essential and applicable technologies, that we depend on severely, are working just on the substrate of the internet. I strongly believe that the governments have to distribute this infrastructure widely across the country for all citizens. There are two reasons why I subscribe to this idea which are separately elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, the range of internet usages is very huge and out of the imagination these days.
I believe that the majority of people in society need the internet to accomplish their daily and routine tasks, regardless of age, gender, education level, occupation, or social class. For example, office employees need it as well as workers, an employee to arrange meetings or sending e-mails, a worker for simpler ones like reading the terms of his contract, or checking his wage at the end of the month. In addition, teachers need the internet to set assignments, send homework, or keep in contact with parents, while students need it for sending homework answers or doing research. Also, The internet has an indisputable role in governmental regulations to make possible the dream of virtual governing, to lessen the usage of paper to keep forests safe, and to help in clarification of state transactions to fight against corruption. As a personal experience, I need the internet every day, even every moment, to do my job duties, to have contact with my family in another city, and to have fun. This huge number of applications make the internet one of the most essential needs of citizens in any society less or more.
Moreover, the internet because of its innate characteristics is something out of the ability of individual persons, so it must be prepared by governments. To explain more, if the government doesn't invest enough in public transportation, of course, people will face difficulties, but they can manage to move by other ways like walking or using their cars. But if there is no internet available what they can do to afford it? It is completely out of reach. These complexities emphasize the role of governments to ease internet usage.
In conclusion, I am in the opinion of internet critical importance for citizens and its complications. Therefore, I propose that the government should establish the infrastructure for people because they need it more than anything else, also obtaining internet services is out of citizens' capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Tpo 54 integrated 86
- tpo 62 integrated 68
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- tpo 55 integrated 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nts. To explain more, if the government doesnt invest enough in public transportation,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14628297362 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09511977195 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573141486811 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3187851037 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214364801777 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655706888883 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365993988201 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116815572346 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343273080497 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nts. To explain more, if the government doesnt invest enough in public transportation,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14628297362 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09511977195 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573141486811 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3187851037 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214364801777 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655706888883 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365993988201 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116815572346 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343273080497 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.