The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The provided chart illustrates the bifurcation of landlines and mobile phones users in percentage among various parts of the country. The data has taken 7 countries into consideration.
Comprehensively, the number of landlines users in US, Canada and Denmark are higher than the number of cell phone users in these countries. On the contrary, in Germany, UK, Italy, and Sweden
the number of cell phone users are higher than land phone users.
In Italy, Sweden and UK the number of cellphone usage is popular by minimum 80% and beyond whereas the number of land phone users in each country vary with almost 60% to under 70% to below 50% each respectively.
The statistics also shows that Italy has the maximum number of phone users with 90% whereas Denmark has the highest land phone users among rest of the countries by almost 90%.
Countries like Canada, US share a similar trend of exceeding the land phone users over cell phone users. Cellular telephone consumers are under 70% in both the countries whereas canada marks telephone line users under 40%
and USA marks below 50% each depicting a significant gap between its utilization. Germany on the other hand contradicts this trend and provides us with considerable drop by 20% among the two categories. Landline is popularly used in the country by 60% and cell users by 70% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-11 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executive in six different types of professions across the Uk in 2007 78
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hensively, the number of landlines users in US, Canada and Denmark are higher tha...
^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trary, in Germany, UK, Italy, and Sweden the number of cell phone users are highe...
^^^
Line 12, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the other hand contradicts this trend and provides us with considerable drop b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04867256637 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67048870187 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7309124153 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244429197523 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113533100853 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604456663403 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140505012714 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491864006485 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.