Some people prefer interactive classes, others prefer to only listen to the teacher speak. Which do you prefer?
Some people prefer to have interactive classes, while others prefer to have classes with no interaction and just want to listen to the lecturer. Personally, I prefer to have interactive classes. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will examine in the following essay.
First, Interactive classes can help students to perform better in their academics and get good grades. When the classes are interactive, students tend to discuss more about the topic, so they will develop deeper understanding of the subject. As the students spend more time on the subject, they can easily remember and recall the topics during examination and express them in a better way. As a result, students can perform better in their examinations and get good grades. For instance, When I was in sophomore year, I had International Relations course as part of my coursework. It is a very dynamic subject, so my professor often made students to read the topics from different sources and convey our opinion in the class. By hearing to many opinions of my classmates, I developed a greater understanding of the subject. Consequently, in my final examination, I was able to express my thoughts from various perspectives. As a result, I got good grades in the subject. I am sure that if the class had not been interactive, I would not have performed well in final examination.
Second, Students can improve their communication skills by having interactive classes. When students are made to convey their thoughts in the classroom, they should communicate in a way, which others are able to interpret easily. Eventually, students will learn the effective way to communicate their thought with others. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. In my university, I took a humanities course, which often required students to take seminars and do presentations. In the beginning, I struggled a lot because I was not able to communicate properly in front of people and had anxiety issues, so I worked on developing my communication ability. Eventually, I developed my communication and public speaking skills. Taking this course also helped me to overcome my fears and anxiety issues. I am sure that if I had not taken the course, I would not have been able to develop my communication skills.
In conclusion, I believe that classes should be interactive because students can learn more and perform better in exams and can develop their communication skills.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 76
- Which viewpoint do you agree with Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives 73
- Humans will reduce the usage of fossil fuels in next 20 years 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Some people prefer interactive classes others prefer to only listen to the teacher speak Which do you prefer 65
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07425742574 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07391063237 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460396039604 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6845028396 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1304347826 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1550169035 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497775065443 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955536185313 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13225523755 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147719854562 0.0645574589148 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07425742574 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07391063237 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460396039604 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6845028396 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1304347826 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1550169035 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497775065443 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955536185313 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13225523755 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147719854562 0.0645574589148 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.