When it comes to the usage of fossil fuels for the next twenty years, some people believe that the usage will increase, while some believe that the usage will decrease, personally, I believe that the usage of fossil fuels will decline in the coming twenty years for two reasons, which I will examine in the following essay.
To begin with, due to the latest technological advancements, people are encouraged to shift from using fossil fuels for energy to more renewable and clean energy sources. To illustrate, the invention of electric cars, especially Tesla, provided a great alternative for people, since it runs purely on electricity, which is cheaper than petrol. Moreover, this invention motivated many people to shift from vehicles that run on fuel to electric cars, which reduces the usage of fossil fuels. We can already notice this effect in the USA, where more and more people are purchasing the Tesla, electric cars, over the cars that run on gasoline. For instance, my uncle, who is 58 years old, used cars that run on petrol all his life, even he purchased a new electric car. I am sure that with coming advancements in science, new inventions will surely shift towards an eco-friendlier source of energy.
Furthermore, excessive usage of fossil fuels will lead to adverse consequences. We, the people, cannot afford to cause any more damage to the environment, since there has been enough damage already caused by human activities like deforestation, sand mining, coal-burning, and many others. For example, global warming, one of the consequences, which we face now, is mainly due to the excessive level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is mainly produced by the incineration of fossil fuels. Many world nations are introducing stringent laws to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide to protect the earth from further deterioration. For instance, recently all the world nations pledged to reduce their carbon dioxide emission by half by 2050. With the laws becoming more and more strict, the usage of fossil fuels will reduce in twenty years.
In conclusion, fossil fuels usage will surely reduce in the coming twenty years. This is because of the latest technological advancements, which are moving towards eco-friendlier options and importance to preserve the earth from further degradation.
- Which viewpoint do you agree with Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives 73
- cane frogs problem in autralia 81
- Which viewpoint do you agree with Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives 60
- Some people prefer interactive classes others prefer to only listen to the teacher speak Which do you prefer 65
- Children should be prohibited from playing video games 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19363395225 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77014020048 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488063660477 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5335946243 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.533333333 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34287200536 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120358325078 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132761219485 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227491915099 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920048784953 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.