The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of goods delivered by four different means of transportation in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002. Overall, using the road for delivery was the main way while the pipeline was the least choice.
In 1974, the largest amount of commodities was conveyed on road, nearly 70 million tonnes, while half of these was delivered on water and rail, around 40 million tonnes. Compare to the number of goods which was transported by road, the use of pipeline was approximately one in ten.
From 1974 to 2002, the means of the highway had increased in most periods, besides slightly dropping for several years, but still reached the peak among the others, at over 95 million tonnes of goods. Similarly, pipeline use was more popular with the stable rise, which forth times in 2002.
Shipping by water and rail was the same start point at first, the former increased 10 million tonnes within 10 years, then stayed stably in 15 years before reaching 60 million tonnes in the end. In contrast, the latter dropped the same number during two decades, finally rising to the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- The map below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for use in the construction industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 78
- It is inevitale that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, similarly, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38986780891 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4911755545 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106318257372 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572028870066 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804500843517 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761329459905 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731541803538 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, similarly, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38986780891 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4911755545 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106318257372 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572028870066 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804500843517 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761329459905 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731541803538 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.