People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
It is important to learn new things every day that may be from people from the same level or the people from the higher level. In my opinion, people learn better from their coworkers and fellow students rather than from people at a higher level. In support providing the following two reasons.
To begin with, people working together and students with same age group have same level of understanding than any senior higher-level person like a professor because senior people already learned that specific topic or concept and they will be taught at a superior level which is difficult to understand for the mid-level or lower-level candidate. On the other hand, people with the same age group help their colleagues to better understand a specific topic. In my own experience, when I was studying in college, I was able to understand data structure and algorithm subject better from friends than my professor. Because the teacher always explains a topic at a high level which is hard to digest for me on the other hand I was able to understand that easily from my friend.
Secondly, people working at a higher level have less time than people working at the lower level. It is a very tedious task to get appointments from higher-level people to understand any specific task which is not the case in coworkers. My own personal experience is a compelling example of this while doing my first project in the industry I always had trouble getting time of my supervisors because of his busy schedule that is why whenever I had to learn any topic from him I was not able to that However, my colleagues and I have similar working schedule so that's why he can easily provide me time and always makes my any difficult topic easier.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that people learn things better from their own level people than any higher level people because of above two reasons that same understanding level and availability of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Malaria parasite essay 90
- Many people are trying to reduce the amount of meat that they eat but they still crave meat products Scientists have recently developed methods to create simulated meats from vegetable protein that have the appearance taste and texture of real meat to sat 81
- Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...gher level. In my opinion, people learn better from their coworkers and fellow student...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... and I have similar working schedule so thats why he can easily provide me time and a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78443113772 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61489539705 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446107784431 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.877811628 48.9658058833 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.272727273 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3636363636 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400610260877 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20156322088 0.076458572812 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145928220636 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319407353018 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107601393247 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.