WRITING TASK 2
You should spend 40 minutes on this task.
Fewer students are studying science at school and university, favouring more computer based subjects instead.
Is this a positive or negative development? What are the reasons for this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, more and more students are favorite in IT subjects rather than scientific ones. In my point of view, this is a negative development, and this phenomenon could be explained by some reasons.
In a realistic view, it is reasonable that this development is negative. Firstly, all subjects and jobs need to have enough people to make a balanced school and market. If students try to learn computer programming and find jobs in the technology field so there will not have enough people working in other fields. Gradually, pupils will think that learning and majoring in a computer-based field is the only way to become successful. Moreover, learning subjects like IT requires students to look at the computer screen too much, which can cause some eye problems.
So what are the reasons for that? In the 4.0 evolution, technologies and computers have been a part of our life. Because of our technologies, it is clear that many people, especially students want to know how to use those technologies. That is why students want to learn computer-based subjects. Furthermore, students believe that studying those subjects will help them to earn higher salaries. Jobs related to the computer field will help people get higher money, so it can make students want to study and work in that field.
In conclusion, this phenomenon is a negative problem, which can affect students in many ways. It could be caused by some reasons, mostly from the growth of the world’s technologies and our thought. In my opinion, these problems can affect students more if people still think it the negative way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-13 | Phạm Minh Quang | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 82 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | Trần Khôi Nguyên | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ologies and our thought. In my opinion, this problems can affect to students more if...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88686131387 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65539228935 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0646650404 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236030302502 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870699781673 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600204450395 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153588265564 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340574006858 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.