The line graph demonstrates the tendency of consuming meat and poultry per capital in the US between 1955 and 2012.
It is clearly seen that the amount of beef experienced a significant fluctuation and it was also the most consumed product over a course of 57 years, starting from 1955, whereas the amount of pork remained unchanged. By contrast, a considerably rise was seen in the use of broilers and turkey from 1955 to 2012.
In 1955, the consumption of beef by the US started at approximately 60 pounds, and went up gradually to reach a peak of 90 pounds in the 1976s. This figures was significant fell to 50 pounds for the rest of the period. In contrast, the intake of pork almost had no change with nearly 40 pounds per person.
Turkey consumption witnessed a stabilization 10 pounds in 2012, while the amount of broilers consumed by US citizens underwent a dramatic increased to nearly 60 pounds, and overtook beef consumption to become the highest in the last year of the period.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...f pork remained unchanged. By contrast, a considerably rise was seen in the use of broilers and tur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...of 90 pounds in the 1976s. This figures was significant fell to 50 pounds for the r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7183908046 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82062150383 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6306305395 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138154737551 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650501057032 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875360147311 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10419765869 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921249628995 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.