frog
Both the reading and listening discuss whether the declination of the frog population is solvable or not. The former argues that by controling three factors the frog population can be saved where the latter contradicts that none of the method discusses in the reading is practical to solve the problem.
First of all, the author contends that the chemical pestisides are contributing to the harmful attack to the frog nerve system and thus creating breathing problem that leads to death to the frog population. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, it is economically injustice for those farmers in certain area where the frog population are endangered to control their use of pesticides bacause this will create a huge crops loos fpoor them and they can not compete with other fermars who do not face such restriction.
Secondly, The reading asserts that, deadly fungus thicken the frog skins and since the frog use their skin to breath, they have serious health problem and hoping that by injecting antifungal medicin this problem can easily solve. However the professor rebuts that, it is extremely difficult to capture every individual frog and inject them the medici.Moreover, he adds that the injection do not confirm the protection of the upcomming gerenation from the fungus and thus the off spring also have to take the medicin which will be complicated and expensive.
Finally, the text claims that, the frog habitant that is the wather areas are in danger due to the heavy use oad draining and claims that by controling them the frog population can be saved. On the other hand, the listening counters that, the water land controling is not the perfect solution since the water lands are declining due to the global warming effect. He further argue that, without controling the global warming the water lands can not be saved so that the declining frog population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-11 | sanddy | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | dxy40747 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | zuhn | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- continent 11
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad 85
- astro 16
- birds 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... medicin this problem can easily solve. However the professor rebuts that, it is extrem...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ividual frog and inject them the medici.Moreover, he adds that the injection do not conf...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...o the global warming effect. He further argue that, without controling the global war...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58756691656 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522435897436 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9483614251 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.777777778 110.228320801 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 21.698381199 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5555555556 7.06452816374 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362849767713 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183752803324 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939034460843 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239079607841 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192247753298 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.