In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors, and they lack a sense of community. What are the causes? How to solve this problem?
It is true that more and more people do not have a tight relationship with their neighbors, leading to not truly understanding the value of a community. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that people could connect to their neighborhood more by participating in the public activities.
There are various reasons why people do not know their next door friends. Firstly, in this day and age, people have to deal with hectic schedules at work, therefore, do not have much time at home to build up their relationship. In Ho Chi Minh city, a metropolitan area in Vietnam, the majority of inhabitants work from the early morning till late night, which means they come home merely for rest and sleeping. Being exhausted after a long day, people would be more likely to stay in their place rather than hanging out and talking with their neighbors. Secondly, the cutting edge technology helps people to keep in touch with their friends via the Internet, so they might be too lazy to go out for chatting. Instead of going outside and finding someone to talk with, what they need to do is lie on the bed and use the phone to call for some friends. Consequently, they could not meet their neighbor to make friends, and the sense of community would be lacking.
In my view, the population management board could provide the dwellers with more social activities to gather people. By joining those activities, the citizens have more opportunities to get to know each other well. They could hang out to meet the neighbors, and in the activities they would have more things in common to talk about For example, the Vinpearl residential area in Vietnam usually organized some contests for the local residents' kids such as handcraft, dancing or singing. While those contests take place, the parents could attend there and watch their kid’s performance. Viewing the contest, inhabitants could discuss the performance together. Obviously, taking part in those activities gives residents a chance to meet and start a relationship with their neighbor, which would form a community.
In conclusion, I believe that gathering people into social activities could make people closer and closer with each other and form a strong community.
- In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Film were produced by big company in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job or shortage money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 74
- Some educators believed that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on TV and the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have more things in common to talk about For example, the Vinpearl residential ar...
^^
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose activities gives residents a chance to meet and start a relationship with th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96560846561 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66322765776 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.22934505 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181518930873 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682455757893 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504159425343 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107843813939 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628326008183 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.