Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree
It is condemned that the advanced technologies directly affect the communication skills in today's complex society. Although in a few specific contexts, I am against this statement, I am of the opinion that, by and large, the social interaction has been interrupted by the use of cell phones.
Admittedly, the benefits of the enhanced technologies should not be denied. Firstly, the distance between people is not a concerning issue anymore as it has been overcome by mobile phones. Thus, people regularly keep in touch with their relatives who live abroad. Additionally, the introvert members of society are likely to become more active since expressing their ideas easily via various gadgets. As a result, they could be on the verge of more social which might be helpful for their future contacts. Consequently, the advantages of cell phones had better to be accepted.
However, in general, I would support that the improved mobile devices disrupt the face-to-face contact due to the several reasons. To begin with, the value of talking with the family members is more likely to decrease since the most of people spend their spare time on using the gadgets. More specifically, the possible time with family has already been occupied with natural needs such as working or studying, in spite of it, the rest of time is squandered on different functions of mobile phones. Furthermore, the young children are growing in a telecommunication period which will lead to the hardship about making a friendship. For instance, I have never come across any difficulties in terms of talking to new people as I had a wide social life in my childhood.
In conclusion, while the mobile access has made interaction easier, when viewed as a whole, I mostly believe that it avoids people of a live contact.
- Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- In cities an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors There is no longer sense of community what do you think are the causes of this problem and suggest methods to solve it 84
- n some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 56
- Some employers believe that job applicants social skills are more important than their academic qualifications Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...rs is more likely to decrease since the most of people spend their spare time on using the gad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, by and large, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03367003367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88146645228 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.229970079 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169909332714 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051026708847 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294706921449 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096610312866 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119411992711 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.