Opinions are divided on whether economic growth plays an integral part in enhancing people’s living quality. While several people claim that the development of the economy would be forbidden due to its adverse impacts on environment, I firmly believe that economic growth is the most effective way to tackle some issues related to poverty.
On the one hand, with the rapid development of industrialization, many poisonous chemicals from produced facilities or factories are dumped into environment and emissions are released into the atmosphere, which trigger severe environmental contamination. For instance, local factories that manufacture plastic products always discharge untreated waste into rivers or lakes nearby, consequently, it can cause water pollution and kill the aquatic species inhabiting these places. Both these issues have negative impacts on people’s health and destroy our planet. Additionally, deforestation to construct more infrastructure for economic activities also damages the habitat of wild species and makes the Earth less green.
On the other hand, when national authorities take numerous measures to boost the economy, the unemployment rate is decreased by offering for local people to seek new jobs to fulfill their demands and support financially for their families. In this way, the living standard can be enhanced and lessen the rate of poverty across the country. Furthermore, it is indisputable that economic activities can give a rise to the development of education, which means that children entirely have more chance to be well-educated. They can attend school and acquire knowledge in one or more specialist sectors to get more job opportunities and have brighter career prospects.
In conclusion, I still maintain my original viewpoint that people can be beneficial from economic growth such as attaining more job opportunities and improving their living standards; however, I also believe that several negative effects on environment could be addressed by investigating some sustainable measures in manufacturing.
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The process below shows how to make dough for a pizza Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment 56
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73615635179 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16083457883 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8623745141 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20429423762 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763232710133 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623369187658 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132974021537 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700895843875 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.