Young people are often influenced in their behaviors and situations by others the same age, this is called peer pressure. This will support this argument by analyzing the merits mentioned below.
Human lives in bad environment will have many harms of it. Playing with friends with personalities has even more negative effects on people’s personalities. First, choosing a friends to play is extremely important because when you have a good friend in behavior and manners, they will give you positive and sincere things, not people who lead you down a bad path. This supports, presumably, not only supports you in your work but also in your life later on. Have a good friend, like having a good fulcrum in life. Second, friendship always start simple from cherish someone because he or she spends time with you, or can help you study better. Friendship between people who are happy, encouraging each other and trying to shape their dreams is a forever friendship.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits when you choosing a friend who is bad in behavior and character. First, playing with a bad friend you will be affected by their negativity. For example, you have a dream, as graduate from university or contribute to society, is important. People who lack a clear, negative purpose or direction in life tend to have friendship that go nowhere or friendships based on dependence. In some cases, such friendships actually encourage destructive behavior.
Friendship is the real property. Roman philosopher Cicero was said: "Friendship is closer than affection" and "Life without friendship is like a world without sunshine. Therefore, when you choose a good friend, it is like light. the sun is shining on you and your life will become much more beautiful.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-19 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- Some people think that history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present 67
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006 61
- The chart below shows the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Some people think that should bailiwick the science of food and how to compose it Others think th 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...people’s personalities. First, choosing a friends to play is extremely important because ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...choose a good friend, it is like light. the sun is shining on you and your life wil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13157894737 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93884229805 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6314333598 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805746603056 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290861426817 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310243816945 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053658527539 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340244436816 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.