In the future, all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantage of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages ?
According to statement, in future eras, all vehicles which includes cars, buses, trucks and so on will become driverless and individuals only use such transportation to reach their destination as passengers. From my prospective, although merits to this notion outweigh demerits, yet there are few of disadvantages which reveals due to this trend. Couple of views are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is worth considering that, science sector becomes proliferate with advancement in innovations of technology. Due to which, their predictions regard transportation, industrialisation and so on will also maximize. Hence, due to such trends, in future decades, transport system will alter which dominants plenty of significant aspects rather than negative impression. First and foremost is minimised in utilisation of natural resources which include fuels such as petroleum, diesel. Because, when individuals travel in vehicles as passengers, this manner is considered as car pooling. Thus, less number of cars are driven due to which lower amount of fuel becomes utilise which results to conservation of natural resources. Apart from that, this also leads to reduction of pollution and overcome trafic congestion. Because, if minimum count of automobiles are on roads, hence release of harmful gases become reduce in atmosphere and also loudness of horns is decreased. As a result, this leads to less congestion of traffic and pollution degradation. Additionally, this trend reveals preservation of time in busy hectic schedule. Because, masses become able to reach their destination with comfort zone and punctuality of time. This results to be convinient manner for individuals in future decades.
On other hand, there are fewer count of disadvantages of future transportation. First of all, if individuals travel with such driverless automobiles they become more lazy and prohibiting physical tasks. Due to which, they only prefer long hour siting schedule with comfortability. Hence, this would represented numerous health problems which includes obesity, deficiency in metal and physical growth. Thus, they will become trap with plenty of diseases which shows negative impact on their immune system.
To recapitulate, I personally consider, despite the fact that, positive aspects of future transportation are higher in comparison to demerits because of its beneficial attitudes. However, this nation also represents few of negative results especially on health of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that it is the government s responsibility to transport children to school while others believe parents should do that Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stage to enable adjustment 10
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 61
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city centre from 2003 to 2012 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'represent'
Suggestion: represent
... with comfortability. Hence, this would represented numerous health problems which includes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, apart from, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73513513514 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15918547814 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57027027027 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1801050303 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146413166737 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406312437864 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546164167753 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952175104244 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593020288225 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.