Problems in Protecting Wild Tauna
Both the reading article and lecture discusses about the a particular measure adopted to save the decreasing population of wild tuna (large ocean fish species): restricting them on the ocean cages and feeding the fish until they grow to the required size. While the author suggests three specific problems in the adopted measures, the speaker challenges the proposition made by the author. In his opinion, there has been advancement in solutions for each of the mentioned problems which will be discussed in detail in following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading article, begins by mentioning that incapability of the female tuna to lay eggs for the reproduction has compelled the farmers to appropriate the young tuna from the ocean. As a result, the population of the tuna is greatly reduced since there are no other means of substitution of tuna after being sold. The lecturer, however, confutes the claim made by author arguing that the particular problem no longer persists; he contends that female tuna populations can be injected to activate the hormones to ensure that they will lays eggs in the restriction environment too. He also assures that no additional health risk will appear for both tuna and humans. It completely falsifies the claim of the author.
The writer further asserts that production of the tuna will be very expensive for the farmers as the cost of fish, on which they feed for the particular nutrient supply, will be higher. The speaker questions the adequacy of the claim made by author. He maintains that it not necessary that fish are only source of that particular nutrient required for the tuna. Additionally, he points out that there is a discovery of a particular plant that contains same nutrients as the fish possessed. Thus, the production of such plants will be very cheap ultimately reducing the cost of the tuna production for farmers with its application.
The reading article, finally, posits about the parasitical infection susceptibility of such grown tuna providing an example of tuna from coast of Southern Australia. The article mentions about the extreme infection of the tuna in the particular place with the blood fluke that damaged the tuna population severely. As opposed to the authors opinion, the lecturer argues that various treatment process can be adopted for such infestations. For instance, in the same coast, scientists found that transferring the cases at distant location from offshore to the deepest ocean reduced the infection of the blood fluke. The main reason is: the flukes serve on the particular nutrient which are abundant on the offshore and scarce on that particular part.
To summarize, the author and speaker holds the opposite views on the adopted strategy to save the population of wild tuna which causes difficulty for both of them in finding common ground.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ing article and lecture discusses about the a particular measure adopted to save the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lay'
Suggestion: lay
...e the hormones to ensure that they will lays eggs in the restriction environment too...
^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... population severely. As opposed to the authors opinion, the lecturer argues that vario...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... instance, in the same coast, scientists found that transferring the cases at dis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 30.3222958057 214% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 5.01324503311 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1373.03311258 174% => OK
No of words: 465.0 270.72406181 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1376344086 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.04702891845 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73214444166 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 145.348785872 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470967741935 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 419.366225166 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1579714592 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.736842105 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4736842105 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0452965944086 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156071126788 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265713908863 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378144560874 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406856511114 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 63.6247240618 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.