The provided line charts illustrate the changes in proportions of households with electrical appliances and the figures of hours of housework in a country from 1920 to 2019.
It is obvious from the charts that the rate of ownership of electrical appliances witnessed an enormous upward trend between 1920 and 2019. On the contrary, there is a remarkable fall in the amount of hours spent doing housework per week over the period.
In 1920, a dramatic increase was undergone in the percentage of refrigerator, started from 0% and reached a peak at 100% between 1920 and 2019, followed by constant stability at 100\% Moreover, in 1920, the rate of people using vacuum cleaner rose enormously from 30% to 100\% in 2000 and still remained unchanged at the same percentage. Washing machine was the most common use at the beginning, at 40\% and oscillated around 60\% to 70% from 1940 to 2000, followed by a slight growth to nearly 75\% in 2019.
As can be seen from the second chart, the figures for hours of housework per week hit the highest point at 50\% in 1920, and progressively decreased to 10% in 2019.
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 11
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, still, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80729166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69499419417 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9291704078 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.833333333 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225040920554 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134810565373 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088181169389 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173443477821 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979844310775 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.