In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the fact that agriculture is rapidly progressing over the world, many people in many countries are suffering from starvation. There are multiple causes for this occurrence, and we may take a variety of methods to address it.
The primary reason why people in many nations go hungry is because of the weather. Despite the emergance of modern agriculture, the weather in some places, particularly those in Africa and the Middle East, is too harsh for humans to cultivate rice or other trees for food. This caused the price of food trees to rise, and the poor were unable to purchase them, resulting a famine crisis. The second reason of starvation is that certain nations rely largely on foreign sponsorship, which is not always sufficient to feed all citizens of these tertiaries.
Despite significant challenges, there may be a number of initiatives to address them. To begin, industrialized countries should send specialists to the countries suffering starvation to train inhabitants how to apply modern farming techniques. When specialists visit these areas, they can research methods for dealing with tough weather and offer farmers with proper advise in order for them to generate better crops. Second, governments in these impoverished nations should pursue alternate economic development strategies to be able to reduce reliance on donors. As these nations get wealthy, governments will be able to import rice and other goods from other countries to feed their populations.
In conclusion, hunger in many nations is caused by the harship of climatic conditions and the reliance on sponsors, and these two problems may be handled by the counsel of specialists in developed countries and the growth of their economies.
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
- The bar chart shows the percentage of school children learning to play different musical instrument in 2005 2010 2015 59
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86484020301 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2153819389 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139542559734 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552513238695 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612253913049 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933243993605 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046278057933 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.