The two maps below show road access to the city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The two pictures given illustrate several changes in the way of approaching the city hospital in two years 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the infrastructure was upgraded mostly in parking areas and roads, which lead to the hospital.
Regarding the maps, in 2007, both staff and other public purposes shared the same parking area, which is located on the east of Hospital Road. Over three years, this car park served hospital personnel only, and for communal uses, a new one was constructed on the east of the hospital, connected by a short path.
In addition, there were significant changes in 2010. Two new roundabouts in the north and the south of Hosptial Road connected the intersection between Ring Road and City Road. Alongside Hospital Road, six bus stops had been erected to establish a brand new bus station, which was opposite the staff parking. From the station, there were two paths linked with the roundabout.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the type of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In some countries more people are becoming interseted in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can peope research this question 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97402597403 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57781575887 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0268996723 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177719100366 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781414817072 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657367649415 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105914380832 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778809343883 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.