Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to
the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive
for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In some workplaces, staff, who serve as a fulcrum of a certain achievement in companies, are usually awarded with bonuses. In my view, this rewarding system not only is a stimulus for further developments in companies, but it is likely to build strong bonds between managers and employees.
First, as money is mostly what people work for, using it as a source of rewarding will probably make individuals try harder. They may tap the allocated money for purchasing what they would not be able to buy for their fixed salaries. They can be indirectly attracted to experience the pleasure of eating costly meal once more, for example. Second, workers' attitudes toward their employers is also influenced by this system. They will possibly not see any reasons to complain, thereby having the sense of gratitude.
This system, however, neglects tens and hundreds of staff working there. Employees can be motivated by fairly distributed awards more than those given only to numbered people. Because many people get the same sort of thing, they have the opportunity to share what they feel about it. In order to avoid excessive expenditures company managers can opt for reasonable things. Apart from that, the way employers treat people under their control can both increase and lower productivity. Trusting, seeking to understand and help when necessary are a huge encouragement for workers.
By way of conclusion, for the sake of avoiding a victory where some win and others lose, employers can consider rewarding more workers and recognizing some of the major principles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | quytnee | 74 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Fedya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | sheep | 80 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Others however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss both these views and give your own 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...individuals try harder. They may tap the allocated money for purchasing what they...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... rewarding more workers and recognizing some of the major principles.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, apart from, for example, sort of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74878184197 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0502731028 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313408975544 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946802749862 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530018604516 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181371633501 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028059414769 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.