The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of people learning English in different countries in 2010 and 2015.
In general, the percentage of people learning English online increased in all countries while the opposite was true for those attending evening classes, especially in country B. In addition, no one went abroad to learn English in country C in 2010 while this choice was fairly popular in the other two countries.
In 2010, 94% of English learners in country C attended evening English classes, compared to 70% in country A and 72% in country B. In contrast, no English learners in country C chose to study abroad while the figures in country A and B were 25% and 20%, respectively. The proportions of people learning English online were under 10% in all countries (5% in country A, 8% in country B and 6% in country C).
After 5 years, there were significant changes in the percentage of people learning online, with the most noticeable being a fourfold increase to 32% in country B. The figures for country A and C also rose to 10% and 15%, respectively. Conversely, the percentage of people going to evening classes saw a downward trend, with a drop of 3% in country A, 24% in country B and 12% in country C. The figures for people learning English abroad did not change much as they remained at around 20% and higher in country A and B while country C saw a small increase of just 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-06 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | Nguyen Khanh | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | my220904 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | khali | view | |
| 2021-06-07 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 84
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 61
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62248995984 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72268423942 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449799196787 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3618181274 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405667475183 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213914884986 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136257482319 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336491315177 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141094654275 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.