The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The line chart illustrates the quantities of queries received through various modes of communication by the Tourist Information Office in one city from January to June in the year 2011. Overall, it is evident that in person and by letter/email were increasing as opposed to telephone, which is decreasing over the period.

In person modes of communication starting from the lowest point of 400 shows a gradual increase up to 800 in march, which afterwards rockets to more than 1800 and remains as the highest. By letter/email shows some fluctuations which starts from approximately 900 in january first decreases to its minimum point of 800, then begins to touch the point of 1600 afterwards securing the second highest among the three type.

By telephone is the only means that decreases throughout the period. It begins with approximately 750 numbers, which shows a steady decrease of around 50 queries,, then plummets to around 350 in may, and then plateaus off from the month of may to june.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-04 brew 65 view
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-09-01 euphorianmt 84 view
2023-08-03 leuleu28 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...s a steady decrease of around 50 queries,, then plummets to around 350 in may, and...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03614457831 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85806394957 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3636274247 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157690180176 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792819733789 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765402650261 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11590490212 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964569998927 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.