Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, with the development of modern technology, almost every home around the world has a television which includes many types of audiences. Some people watch television to stream their favorite program or movie, while others watch it to spend their free time. So, there is no doubt that television has a positive effect on children and I agree with the statement for the following reasons.
First of all, the way young people behave can change when they watch a television program or cartoon that is only dedicated to them. Many cartoons or animations spread positive energy to people such as My little pony, which is about six ponies that show the journey of how they become friends and how they teach friendship to everyone around them. This animation is great that my little sister always watches it. After she watches the cartoon, she becomes considerate and brings me some snacks when I do my homework. Therefore, she becomes a passionate little girl, who always smiles and helps anyone who needs help. If there were no cartoons like that, my sister would not have learned valuable things, since our family is always busy taking care of them.
Secondly, people watch television programs and movies to gain knowledge. According to a study conducted by neuroscientists, babies at ages one to five memorize knowledge more quickly than adults, because their brains are highly developed at this level. That means they can learn anything, which will not be forgotten in the babies' future life. On top of that, teaching children about a diversity of topics will help them to expand their knowledge, which can be acquired by streaming television programs. For instance, by watching National Geographic Channel, children can learn about different types of animals and how they live and adapt in an environment in which they are dwelling, or by viewing History Channel, they can learn about how people originally generated and how they developed to modern people and so on.
In conclusion, watching television have many advantages on small people's behavior. They can learn and gain knowledge from different types of television programs, and they also will become a better person, if they watch shows and cartoons, only dedicated to them.
- About migration hypothesis 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 66
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Artificial reefs have several benefits Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many 75
- T rex Reading materials Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56609373716 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9474350875 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13437480936 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055571899306 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670958360618 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925464684696 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513792330047 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56609373716 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9474350875 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13437480936 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055571899306 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670958360618 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925464684696 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513792330047 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.