In times of economic crisis, in which field do you think the government can
cut financial support?
1) Art
2) Scientific research
3) Parks and public gardens
Some people think that when a country faces an economic crisis, the government should cut its financial support for artists. Others disagree and argue that the government should spend less money on scientific research. Still, others claim that disbursing fewer budgets on parks and public gardens is a better option. For me, I maintain that
To begin with, the government should save money when a recession occurs, and cutting down resources on supporting artists helps it save a great deal of money. For instance, during the economic crisis twenty years ago in Taiwan, the Taipei City government stopped wasting 10 million dollars per year supporting young musicians. Similarly, the Kaohsiung City government agreed to not allocate 5% of the total budget assisting average artists in finding a job. As a result, both governments saved nearly 20% of their total budget. On the contrary, the Taichung City government put an end to disbursing money on pruning trees in parks and public gardens. Yet, the city government only saved 1 million dollars per year, because hiring people to do horticulture is overall not expensive.
In addition, the government must emphasize citizens' welfare, but cutting expenses on scientific research might make many residents have less welfare to enjoy. For example, the Taiwanese government stopped spending 200 million dollars on supporting biomedicine researchers during the pandemic. Although the government saved millions of dollars, the development of the domestic Covid-19 vaccine was delayed. Consequently, patients do not have any vaccine to take after being infected with Covid. Contrarily, the Singaporean government allocated less funding to the Art and Music Association. Since the association did not contribute to any public welfare in Singapore, the decision did not impact any aspect of Singapore's general public welfare.
Last but not least, governments have to ensure that all residents are living a happy life during the recession. Nevertheless, not financing parks and gardens makes citizens feel unhappy. Take the Hualien County government as an example. Five years ago, the Hualien City government quitted aiding Mei-Zhou national park's construction. Also, the government cut down 500,000 dollars on hiring volunteers to clean garbage in various gardens and parks. Therefore, citizens do not have any place to relax during the weekend, so depression caused the suicide rate to increase from 0.01% to 0.1%. Two months later, the Hualien County government regretted and reduced the amount of money spent on artists instead. Since most artists got used to living an impoverished life, the decision did not affect their mental health. Three months later, the suicide rate decreased drastically.
In conclusion, I believe that cutting down financial support on art is the best way for the government to overcome an economical crisis. After all, the government must save a great deal of money, focus on the public's health, and make sure that citizens can still live a joyful life during the crisis.
- If you are a leader for a group of three to four people which of the following features are the most important when choosing group members honesty the ability to get along well with others the ability to communicate clearly 76
- Which of the following resources is most effective for employers to know about applicants for a position 1 contact the applicant s former employer 2 check the applicant s online profile and social platform 3 provide internship for a month 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Your job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than your social life does 80
- Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to succeed in college 1 Having access to university tutors who can provide one to one instruction for students with difficulties in college study 2 The help and encouragement from the famil 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a better option. For me, I maintain that To begin with, the government should sav...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...esources on supporting artists helps it save a great deal of money. For instance, du...
^^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...did not impact any aspect of Singapores general public welfare. Last but not least, govern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...t way for the government to overcome an economical crisis. After all, the government must ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ave a great deal of money, focus on the publics health, and make sure that citizens can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39748953975 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72469762933 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535564853556 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 17.0 3.08781362007 551% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3958683622 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2307692308 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11538461538 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291651045697 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769005787517 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523034942442 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176612072394 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474184754769 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.