“The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is asserted that the best way to prepare young people for leadership in a society at the government, industry level or other fileds is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. However, this claim stating the best way for preparing young people for leadership position is strongly disagreed on based on the opinions that preparing young people based on just a cooperative mind can make them lackadasical to garmane issues. Also, they need the competitive mind to help build their understanding on life needs and chanlleges.
First, a neophyte shouldn't be shown weakeness but strenghth because thats what will keep them going despite chanlleging situations in respect to leadership positions. Although, they need to be enlighten that being in position is not a bed of roses, some drastics decisions would have to be made at times but instilling a mind of just been cooperative might make them fill so relaxed in the comfort of the position. From research, it is shown that a leader who just cooperates without indepth thought of future conquences or not having an hindsight of what the other party is offering might cause damage to the system.
Second, in a world where the servile depends so much on its leader for financial freedom, improved education, provision of good jobs, a leader cannot be inspired to emacipate is people without developing that competitive mind which enables him/her see beyond other government, industries or any field where him/her operates. From my experience as a Sale Manger at a company, in order to boost sales and elevate the company, there was need for look out of things other companies where involved in, in which we were not. Therefore, giving us an edge in the market.
Conclusively, as much as cooperation is important and necessary for growth admidst a group of people, when its relates to leadership position having a coperative mind and a competitive mind cannot be foregone.
In conclusion the assertion that the best way to prepare young people for leadership in a society at the government, industry level or other fileds is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition is strongly disagreed on based on the above mentioned opinons that preparing young people based on fear and cooperation may be damaging to the level of thinking and also limit that view or aspiration if just asked to cooperate.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...eds and chanlleges. First, a neophyte shouldnt be shown weakeness but strenghth becaus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e shown weakeness but strenghth because thats what will keep them going despite chanl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ught of future conquences or not having an hindsight of what the other party is of...
^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore, giving us an edge in the market. Conclusively, as much as cooperation is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87679993732 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.250842415 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.909090909 118.986275619 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1818181818 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346569895951 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12869684479 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12057026922 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197721691995 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11436747429 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...eds and chanlleges. First, a neophyte shouldnt be shown weakeness but strenghth becaus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e shown weakeness but strenghth because thats what will keep them going despite chanl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ught of future conquences or not having an hindsight of what the other party is of...
^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore, giving us an edge in the market. Conclusively, as much as cooperation is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87679993732 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.250842415 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.909090909 118.986275619 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1818181818 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346569895951 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12869684479 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12057026922 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197721691995 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11436747429 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.