The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The pictures compare the current structure and the future design of a small town so-called Islip.
Overall, the town has changed considerably with the construction of a dual carriageway around the residental areas. Various other developments with respect to shops and housing contribute to the more convenient structure of the town.
Looking at the details of Islip in the planned development, we can see that there is a pedestrian only relative to the disappearance of the main road. It is also noted that traffic will be transformed on to a dual carriageway instead of the main road.
On the North of the township, currently there is a row of shops along with the side of the main road. However, shops are expected to be converted into the bus station, shopping centre, car park and new housing while the countryside will no longer exist.
On the South of the town, shops are expected to remain their positions while it seems that the park will be reduced in size. It appears that more new housing will be built within the ring road.
- TOPIC Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
- Task 2 People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 67
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies 78
- Topic Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is this the case Who are more affected parents or children 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69278872382 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.819347292 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110754099469 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502435211118 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630685676671 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746014888123 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705664060532 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69278872382 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.819347292 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110754099469 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502435211118 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630685676671 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746014888123 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705664060532 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.