Question 4: Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Question 4: Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The importance of the protection of wildlife has always been a topic of controversy. While some people convince that wild animals’ conservation is a waste of money and time, I totally disagree with this opinion and believe that it is beneficial to maintain a healthy wildlife population.
It is acknowledged that the extinction of wildlife animals is a burning issue. Due to the rapid overpopulation in recent years, natural resources are being consumed faster to serve human needs. Consequently, the habitats and food sources of various types of animals all over the world are endangered, leading to the aggravating extinction of numerous animal groups. If the ignorance towards this problem continues, it will result in the loss of every single animal species and since the ecosystem loses its balance, every aspect of life will be affected such as income, livelihoods, local migration, or political situations. For that reason, the state budget oughts to be allocated to protect biodiversity and our ecosystem.
Moreover, I deem that protecting fauna brings substantial benefits to our development. Firstly, wildlife conservation promotes agricultural biodiversity, which has a greater part to play in building a secure, robust, and thriving food system. For example, the locusts' invasion that swept over farms in rural Kenya left farmers only counting crop losses and similar problems can not be solved if their natural predators are extinct. Secondly, increasing healthy ecosystems through conservation improves agricultural productivity thereby stimulating rural livelihoods. Furthermore, diverse ecosystems which are home to unique species can become local tourist attractions, which helps the local economy becomes more profitable and invites a new fusion of investment.
In conclusion, I would argue that wildlife conservation is a worthy cause for the benefits that such scheme can bring about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-20 | Hoa19052004 | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in 2 cities in May 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- the importance of friendship 33
- The maps show the changes of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locusts'' or 'locust's'?
Suggestion: locusts'; locust's
... thriving food system. For example, the locusts invasion that swept over farms in rural...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62975778547 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07349423003 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643598615917 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2073091922 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140639988763 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460085953662 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777540023742 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941146689466 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106513568675 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locusts'' or 'locust's'?
Suggestion: locusts'; locust's
... thriving food system. For example, the locusts invasion that swept over farms in rural...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62975778547 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07349423003 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643598615917 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2073091922 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140639988763 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460085953662 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777540023742 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941146689466 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106513568675 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.