The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph depicting the figure of six distinct types of energy used by Americans during a period of 50 years, commencing from 1980.
It is conspicuous that petrol and oil is by far the most popular energy consumed by people in the US throughout the given time. Additionally, the usage of solar/wind, nuclea, natural gas, coal and petrol and oil energy experience an upward trend and the reverse is true for hydropower.
Starting at 35 quadrillion units, the amount of petrol and oil used by Americans is forecasted to leap drastically and reach a peak at nearly 48 quadrillion units at the end of the period. In addition, the consumption of coal and natural gas were 16 quadrillion units and 20 quadrillion units respectively in 1980. Nevertheless, in 2015, the usage of coal surpassed natural gas and became the second most common energy in the US.
Standing at about 4 quadrillion units at the first year, the consumption of nuclear and solar/wind power witnessed a gradual climb and are predicted to rise at 6 quadrillion units and 5 quadrillion units respectively; whereas, hydropower is likely to become less popular option which remains its consumption over the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of our increasing use of computers 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between the years 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9697432549 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7740631548 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667749715475 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356264001022 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271130622912 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483806018171 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264127702282 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.