The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of energy consumed by six distinct fuels in the United States of America from 1980 to 2008 and projections it until 2030.
It is obvious that petrol and oil, coal, had an upward slightly throughout the period, and nuclear, solar/wind systems, and natural gas were fluctuated but hydropower declined during 1980 to 2030.
As can be seen, After a fluctuated trend until 1995, the petrol and oil increased about 5 units in 2005 and the predictions show it will increase to 45 unit in 2030. By ten consecutive years the coal did not change and then in 1990 raised about 5 units. After that there was no change for 10 years, the projections give data that the coal energy will sugar to 30 units in 2030. Although the natural gas has fluctuated trend until 2015 it will fix until 2030 by around 23 units consumption. The two nuclear and solar/wind energies did not have significant movement from 1980 and 2008 and follow their trend to 2030. In the last energy consumption after a fluctuated orient to 2010 the trend stay fix to 2030 but is has a downward trend throught the period.
As a result, the energy consumption by coal and petrol and oil have hieghr unit than other groups of fuels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it in 2030. By ten consecutive years the coal did not change and then in 1990 rai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6376146789 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46096107924 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.720227608 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179409851509 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839837066379 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521941971357 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112027830351 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691968987349 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.