The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps give some information about an island from before and after its construction.
It is obvious that there was any building before recreating and just have some trees by more than 250 kilometers empty area. On the western place of island is located a beach.
After construction the map changed a lot. Tourists could travel into the island easily by two sail boats that kept for emergency conditions and located on the meddle southern of island. There were two place of accommodation near the beach and close to restaurant. All of accommodations linked by footpath to each other. On the north of islan there is a restaurant for different meals and a reception in the centre that sorrunded by a vehicle track circle and goes to pier. A footpath consider for people who wanted swimming in and relax in the beach.
As a result, threre was a few empty space in the new map after construction and the government notice to this island and its facilities for passengers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-30 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2023-08-08 Mekata view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun place seems to be countable, so consider using: 'two places'.
Suggestion: two places
...e meddle southern of island. There were two place of accommodation near the beach and clo...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75294117647 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73032439103 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9072120781 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240979232113 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900848513873 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960563769206 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162444903321 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924802207163 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.