Space travel has been a reality for some time. Some people think space tourism would develop in the future. Do you think space tourism is a positive or negative development?
Traveling into space has been presented for quite a while since 2001. It is debatable whether or not there is a broader future development of space tourism. I also consider whether advantages outweigh disadvantages of making space as a tourism destination.
On the one hand, the most draw for commercial space tourists is the awe-inspiring experience, a new perspective of Earth, and the most beautiful view humans have ever seen. Most people grow up believing that they will never go to space, and the fact that going can become a reality for some is a huge achievement. Moreover, another big perk of space travel for passengers is the experience of microgravity, where they will be able to feel weightless on the spacecraft for a few minutes. This may not change their perspective on Earth, but it’ll certainly give a feeling of euphoria.
On the other hand, it is true that space travel costs are wildly expensive, being beyond our reach, up to hundreds of thousands of dollars. This kind of money is obviously extremely hard to come by and demonstrates how impactful wealth inequality is. Offering supremely wealthy people exclusive access to something groundbreaking seems to reward people with the highest honour for being rich. It is unfair that the wealthy are given access to space travel above all others. Additionally, there are definite safety concerns about being in space for prolonged periods of time too as well as failures of coming to space travel from time to time.
It seems that there are conflicts between benefits and drawbacks of commercial space tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | vonhuquynh | 73 | view |
- Oil use of major consumers 2015 The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 78
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges
- The pictures illustrate three different types of bridges 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services how happy are you with our IT support offered and current opening hours 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ite a while since 2001. It is debatable whether or not there is a broader future development o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, kind of, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03422053232 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82909664452 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615969581749 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1559501138 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383543339795 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133140137653 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891897376337 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226962027718 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073182315599 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.