Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and protection of wild animal is waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, preservation problems have been becoming necessary significantly all the world while the wildlife has been gradually disappeared due to over-exploitation. Scientists demonstrated that wild animal is important to human beings so humans should save them and their habitats to escape extinction. In my opinion, I do agree that governments should invest money in protecting wild animals because wildlife is related to human survival and benefits.
Firstly, animal species are a crucial part of an ecosystem while humans need a healthier one for existence in a long time. Animal activities contribute to populating more plantations and diversity in biology which supply humans food, fresh air and water, raw material and even medicine. For example, a bird in New Zealand could swallow seeds of native trees and then disperse them in other places of a forest. This natural action helps the development of native trees which could clean the polluted living environment due to the industrial revolution.
Secondly, wildlife has brought many economical advantages as well as is considered a part of national nature. Tourism that could connect with wildlife creates more jobs for local residents. For instance, travelling in natural areas having a lot of wild animals in Africa has attracted more tourists from different nations. The government could not only be taken conservation but also could gain big amounts. Moreover, wild animals are in relation to human ancients and symbols of belief. Particularly, elephants are considered religious beliefs and respected deeply in India.
In conclusion, spending money on protecting wild creatures is an adequately necessary method for human life. It is predicted that more and more governments, companies, communities have been aware of the animal import role and preserved them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-14 | vonhuquynh | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Oil use of major consumers 2015 The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 78
- Writing task 2 Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and protection of wild animal is waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Space travel has been a reality for some time Some people think space tourism would develop in the future Do you think space tourism is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51418439716 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96568617731 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0919126361 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205571007659 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688132940255 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717078071408 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129887496839 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457309719199 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51418439716 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96568617731 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0919126361 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205571007659 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688132940255 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717078071408 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129887496839 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457309719199 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.