The pie chart depicts the vital causes for the reduction in the agricultural land productivity. The table illustrates how these causes had shown their impact on North America, Europe and Oceania throughout the 1990s period.
Overall, the crucial cause of the worldwide land degradation is overgrazing. North America is mainly impacted by overcultivation while Europe and Oceania are highly affected by deforestation and over grazing respectively.
The pivotal cause of the worldwide and degradation, which is overgrazing, constituted 35%. Deforestation is the second highest cause which comprised 30% whereas over-cultivation made up of 28% being the third highest cause of land degradation. The rest accounted for 7% of land degradation.
Only 5% of North America's land was degraded in total where over-cultivation constituted as 3.3% while over-grazing accounted for 1.5% and deforestation being the least made up 0.2% respectively. 23% of the land is degraded in Europe where deforestation accounted for 9.8% while over-cultivation and over-grazing constituted 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. 13% of land was degraded in Oceania where deforestation comprised 1.7% and over-grazing constituted 11.3%.
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence for global climate change Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are u 50
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- One month ago all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one third of its original flow Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet ava 60
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88636363636 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58392589117 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8740970052 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.