Space exploration should be dedicatedly use rovers instead of manned mission
"Exploring the unknown is what makes life" - APJ Abdul Kalam, former President of India
The argument considering to use probes and unmanned mission to collect vital data points as accomplishes till now rather than the risks and cost of manned missions, cover a lot of unstated assumptions and premises that should be considered.
One of the most important factor that comes into play for any mission is the cost. Is the cost of developing mission with robots cheaper than with humans? The world is driven by economics. It is the major decision player. With the massive developments that we have witnessed in the field of robotics, from just a figure which could walk, to modern day Honda Asimo which is employed into a variety of tasks ranging from housekeeping to playing, we have come a long way.
So can a modern robot cost less to develop as well as to maintain and sustain for a mission than a human and achieve the same outcomes? If the answer to the questions comes up to be a resounding yes, then it makes sense. Examples of this approach can be seen from the Mars Rover Missions, eg- Rover Discovery, that has been sent by NASA to research the surface of Mars. It is widely considered, the amount of information, the rover sent back has helped scientists know a lot more in details than the earlier speculations. It has helped discover the chemical compositions to the mineral reserves possible to glaciers that could have existed. Another notable example being of the different missions of the Moon. Since during the start of the moon race, robotics was still in its infancy, the only option was a manned mission like the Apollo 11. These manned missions posed to be great success in determining various aspects about the moon's surface.
The second most important factor that comes to play is the risk involved. Human life is valuable. Considering this, the 1st living being in space was a dog, that was sent by the USSR to study the effects that could be on a human. This is one of the main factors that comes when considering sending men into the unkown. The uncertainty is enormous and can drive any amount of accomplishment into dusts. This is why, during the US presidential adress of the nation after the launch of Apollo 11 mission, had 2 speeches prepared- one for success and the other for failure. If the risk involved is far greater than the assumed accomplishments, it is often considered to not involve and play with human lives.
With the developments in space tech, we have witnessed billionaires going to space, eg Jeff Bezos, space is now becoming a known world. But still, the risks involved have not been reduced. The risks on the other hand has been increased with the large amount of debris of dormant space satellites and launches that pose a great risk to the well known International Space Station.
One hidden factor that always comes into play but is well hidden is the political agenda. Many times, to appease the people, for political gains, to ascertain superiority, unwarrented space programs are granted that have many times resulted in loss of human life- the famous crash of Apollo 15 on re-entering the Earth Atmosphere which happened during the epitome of the Space Race during the Cold War. Many such un-warrented missions have been undertaken to boost the morale of a nation, though many becoming success, few were disasterous too. With a stable world where we live, this can be seen as the last factor that any country or organization can consider, but still is emminent.
Apart from these, there can be a variety of other assumptions regarding the long term plans- inhabiting another planet, that come into play while considering the best options. Examples of this can be seen from the stives by Spacex to develop a stable rocket powerful enough to get humans to mars with enough payloads to help start living and inhabiting the planet. Many space firms share the idea of a multi-panetary human species, and thus, the long term plans and goals can indeed be an important factor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-24 | tanmay1234120312 | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Me Hahaha | 69 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | aditya pandey | 42 | view |
| 2016-10-08 | abcd_skg | 66 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 38
- Space exploration should be dedicatedly use rovers instead of manned mission 60
- men and women do inherent differeny physics Thus they are made for different tasks 70
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp 20 years ago Dr Field conducted a study of Tertia and claimed from his observations that the children were reared by the entire village than by their own biological parents However a new study that i 57
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 15 2
No. of Sentences: 31 15
No. of Words: 696 350
No. of Characters: 3255 1500
No. of Different Words: 330 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.136 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.677 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.509 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 209 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 145 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.452 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.829 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.355 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.243 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.076 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'questions'' or 'question's'?
Suggestion: questions'; question's
...the same outcomes? If the answer to the questions comes up to be a resounding yes, then i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, thus, well, while, apart from, as to, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.6327345309 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 55.5748502994 176% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3349.0 2260.96107784 148% => OK
No of words: 696.0 441.139720559 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8117816092 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13632280105 4.56307096286 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61540486422 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 341.0 204.123752495 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489942528736 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1033.2 705.55239521 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.22255489022 261% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8005098547 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.032258065 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4516129032 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90322580645 5.70786347227 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.20758483034 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210544540837 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487087362668 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508096938356 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955557075505 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580118454458 0.0628817314937 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 98.500998004 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.