Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
However there is a lot of interpret software systems, learning a speech could still be advantageous. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of language software available. First, a translate app online is a great way to enhance communication. This communication support, presumably tends not only give for their opens a conversation but also give for their necessary kills. Second, people used translate app would probably result in greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that is perfect optional instant access to information about translation.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once people use translation software more now. First, people use translation online would likely correspond with population know others language is very little. These reasoned can summary by one word: accurate. Even with all technology development, algorithm improvement and extend language, translators of people is better compared to their computer. Translate is the person always more exactly because these reason: context, guesswork, and human touch. Second, learning language would help we know more language of people because just have only people just can know people language. So, when you can speak a language you can familiar with different, cultural in ference and others factors. People use translate app more can make people depend on technology development, thereby society great burdens for workplace and study environmental. It, instead, would be a more benefits viable option if people use translate app to learning.
Despite this development, I hold the belief that the process of obtaining lingual knowledge is still beneficial in terms of career prospects and cultural experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | nvtrung309 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanhcass | 89 | view |
- The increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Agree Disagree 89
- The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views 56
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
However there is a lot of interpret software sy...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... of language software available. First, a translate app online is a great way to enhance co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...nguage of people because just have only people just can know people language. So, when...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[5]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
... because just have only people just can know people language. So, when you can speak...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60344827586 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90827062873 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0043826095 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166110577891 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580231469089 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659042987785 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100047070749 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586626503386 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.