Some people think an international car free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution Others think there are more effective ways to do this Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do this. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Many people strongly believe that organizing a car-free day can help to decrease air pollution amongst nations. Others suggest there are various useful methods to do this. From my point of view it is not the best way however it can assist to reduce significantly and we will discuss this topic in the following paragraphs.
In fact, nowadays a lot of cities are organizing an international car-free day and this can encourage people to live without cars, trucks and other vehicles. One of the consequences this event is to reduce air pollution, adapt people to live without vehicles and walking or cycling in the streets for their health. This event is important but not the best way because it spans a day and it is crucial to improve the condition of air. I think more and more cities should celebrate the occasion like party.
There is no denying that we can support in the other ways. For example, one of the methods is manufacturing electronic cars because they do not produce toxic gases such as Tesla brand. Moreover, we cannot stop to drive cars all time like free-cars days, therefore, we have to use new methods. My second suggestion is that we should ride bicycle to our office or near distance. This approach has tremendously effectiveness to the condition of air pollution.
In conclusion, these days car industry is increasing dramatically and people demand more cars than in the past so we always need to drive vehicles. Thus, the best way is to produce electronic cars and understand the bad effects of air pollution

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-05 Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ 61 view
2023-01-16 viethung123 73 view
2022-05-05 Mardonbek Ro'zmetov 78 view
2021-10-06 naufalrahman96 78 view
2021-02-09 anna103 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...f air pollution. In conclusion, these days car industry is increasing dramatically...
^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...st so we always need to drive vehicles. Thus the best way is to produce electronic c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88076923077 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.724345098 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.717690506 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6428571429 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35805317356 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115352748952 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625920298499 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213816010857 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647405489193 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.