You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a person's honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader?
In school life, sometimes we have to choose a student as a group leader, and what types of the student have to choose is the most difficult question. Some people believe that honesty is the most important when it comes to choosing a leader, while others think of creativity and social abilities as important qualities as well. I hold the opinion that there are other important qualities as well when we choose a leader.
Admittedly, an honest person can strengthen relationships between groups. Honest one affects people with honesty, so people in the group trust each other. Similarly, under the leadership of an honest person, people develop closer friendships and become intimate. Also, teachers and staff in the school can trust the honest leader. Sometimes, school groups or organizations need to raise funds. For instance, most clubs in the school launched fundraising for organizing the event on the Sports Day. Meanwhile, if club leaders were not honest, they would use this opportunity to line their pockets. It is obvious that the honest leader improves friendships in the group and lets the group possess an excellent reputation.
However, creativity and social skills are still crucial qualities for being a leader. A creative leader can come up with a new idea for the group like organizing a new party, or activity. Furthermore, if the leaders are good at socializing, they will be able to forge great relationships with other organizations and groups. In other words, the groups have more opportunities to corporate with other groups. This will not only increase the reputation of the groups but also help the groups have more opportunities to raise funds. Take my personal experience as a compelling example of this. Thanks to my club leader, we often cooperated with other big and populous clubs, so our club was well-known as well despite being small. Two years ago, my club launched fundraising, and we ended up receiving a big fortune. Therefore, choosing a leader with creativity and social ability is crucial to the groups and organizations.
To sum up, even though being honest is important when it comes to choosing a leader in the group and organization, creativity and social skills are also crucial to them. This is because choosing a leader with creativity and social abilities has positive effects on them. Hence, I consider that there are other important qualities when we choose a leader except for honesty.
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group possess an excellent reputation. However, creativity and social skills ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, except for, for instance, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09452736318 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79683864006 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47263681592 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0089931464 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0434782609 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.39130434783 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334547724274 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107060483281 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537693658857 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217378556059 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245830258431 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.